Laserfiche WebLink
c. There will be no building or other obstruction <br />in the casement area. <br />(1) The access to the proposed dwelling in <br />case of fire will remain the same as if no easement <br />existed. <br />(2) The light and air within the side yard <br />will remain the same as if no easement existed. <br />(3) The openness or "open space" of the side <br />yard will remain the same as if no easement existed. <br />9. The proposed location of the single family <br />dwelling is set back more than 75 feet from the shoreline <br />as required by the city ordinance. <br />ar The proposed loeation of the front of <br />the house exists efoser than the average distanee <br />from the shoreline of existing residenee buildings <br />end nearby letsr <br />br a. The "average set back requirement" wa? not <br />designed nor has it been interpreted in the past <br />to prevent the development as proposed on this <br />sort of unique angulated shoreline adjacent to <br />Jack Rhode's lot. <br />ct bj^ The intent of the "average set back requirement” <br />was to protect the sight lines of neighbors. <br />dr Cj^ The only neighbors whose sight line or view <br />of the lake will be obstructed by the proposed <br />location, the Lauers, have no objection to the <br />proposed location of the dwelling. <br />d. The sight line or view of the lake from the <br />lakeside facade of the Becker house will not be <br />obstructed by the proposed location as shown on <br />Exhibit A. <br />10. The city council has granted variances in <br />such cases in the past. <br />11. A prior house, now removed, was approximately <br />40 feet from the lakeshore. <br />12. Mr. Lauer wants the building to be as far <br />forward as possible. <br />13. Mr. Be* '*er wants the building as far to the <br />rear as possible. <br />-3- <br />1 <br />r <br />J