My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-21-1980 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1980 Planning Packets
>
07-21-1980 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 12:06:12 PM
Creation date
2/15/2023 12:04:47 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- - - - <br />/ / <br />July 16, 1980 <br />Jack Rhode (#546) <br />1410 Bohns Point Road <br />VARIANCE <br />Paqe 2 <br />t K A O. <br />Most discussion regarded how close the house could be placed toward <br />the lake in relation to Section 34.201 relating to average lakeshore <br />setback. Line A - A was drawn between the Lauer & Becker houses with <br />becker saying all construction should be behind that line. Line B - B <br />represents the 75 ft. setback line with Rhode initially requesting <br />construction to tliat point. Line C - C was a line drawn midway between <br />lines A - A and B - B. Line D-D represents an extension of the front <br />line of the Becker house. <br />The Planning Co-;T.ISaion recommended house placement behind line D-D <br />in August, 1977. See Exhibit 17. The Council continued to review the <br />situation and eventually drew in line C - C as a compromise. <br />The final building envelope approved by Resolution No. 851 is shown on <br />Exhibits 8 & 9, with the lakeshore sf.tback being line C - C except <br />where the corner was cut off to preclude any construction in front of <br />line D-D. See Resolution No. 851, Exhibit 7, for the findings, <br />conclusions and conditions. <br />Additional concerns were raised regarding walkway easements across <br />this lot in favor of two properties to the rear which provided lake <br />access and dock rights. Becker contends these constitute a multiple <br />use of the property and therefore preclude residential construction. <br />See Resolution No. 851 and Judge Nicholson's findings. Exhibit 14. <br />NOTE;On June 30, 1980, the Council specifically directed the Planning <br />Commission not to reconsider this issue as there has been no <br />change in status since 1977. <br />This proposal is to renew the lot width and lot area variances previously <br />approved, and proposes to locate the lakeshore setback position as line <br />D-D. Mod', lications to Resoluzio.: No. 851 are suggested by Rhode in <br />Exhibit 15 wliich would affect this change and would also provide for <br />continued use of the walkway easements and docks subject to annual joint <br />use dock licensing as required for more than two users of any dock. <br />This application also requires review of three other variances not applied <br />for nor previously reviewed: <br />1.The plan indicates the deck encroaching at one corner to within <br />72 feet of the shoreline contrary to Section 34.202. There is <br />no apparent hardship and no reason why the plan cannot be changed <br />to eliminate this encroachment.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.