Laserfiche WebLink
TO: <br />FBOM: <br />DATE: <br />SUBJECT: <br />#560Planning Commission and Council <br />Jeanne Mabusth« Zoning Administrator <br />June 5, 1980 <br />#560 Robert & Joanne Mortenson, 1205 Arbor Street <br />Conditional Use Permit <br />WORK SESSION <br />Zoning District: RR-IB <br />AREA: approximately 3.7 acres <br />APPLICABLE ORDINANCE: 34.025 <br />The applicant proposes construction of a 48' X 52.5' greenhouse» <br />13>s' in height, that meets all the setbacks of the zoning district. <br />There is approximately a 100' setback between the proposed greenhouse <br />and existing house. There is adeguate area for additional off-street <br />parking on the site. The applicants have stated there will be no <br />need for any extensive exterior lighting - only one outside light. <br />The building inspector has reviewed the plans and type of greenhouse <br />proposed and he finds no problem. Jacobs does request the information <br />on "testing" referred to in the engineer's memo when the applicant <br />submits plans for a building permit. <br />AS for screening, there is a natural screening of trees along the rear <br />and side of the greenhouse. The slope of the lot along the street <br />side provides another natural barrier. <br />The on—site manager will report on the location of the drainfield <br />and the proposed location of the greenhouse for the June 23, 1980 <br />meeting. <br />STAFF UPDATE - JUNE 16, 1980 <br />I have reviewed the wetlzmds maps and find there are no designated wetlands <br />within the subject property. Questions to be answered in consideration of <br />the Mortenson application are as follows: <br />1. Does this use appear compatible with pattern of neighborhood development? <br />2,. Does P. C. feel the access road is adequate for this kind of operation? <br />3. What specific limitations would an operation of this kind require? <br />a) limitation of one physical plant <br />b) limitation on "traffic generating" activities <br />4. Would there be a dimunition in neighbor's property values? <br />5. Would proposed operation be detrimental to the public health, safety <br />and welfare?