My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-03-1981 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
08-03-1981 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 11:50:05 AM
Creation date
2/15/2023 11:49:49 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
^4 <br />MINUTES OP THE PL7VNNING COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 3, 1981 Page 7 <br />O Jabbour reviewed once again for the applicant that since <br />the proposed improvement was over 50% of the fair market <br />value that he requires a lot area and lot width variance <br />in addition the proposed application would require an <br />approximate 6 ft. setback encroachment into the average <br />lakeshore setback area. <br />Jabbour noted for the applicant that the improvements <br />could all be designed to be placed within the average <br />setback <br />The applicant stated that it would demolish the structure <br />to move it back. In addition to demolishing several <br />mature trees. <br />Jabbour noted that he had at least 16 ft. to the nearest <br />tree and that he felt that this was enough area. <br />Ammerman presented to the Planning Commission a petition <br />of 8 signatures approving his proposed variance. <br />Mabusth read a list of violations that were observed <br />on Mr. Ammerman's property. A list of violations <br />acquired from several neighbors and staff observations <br />1 - Large boat being repaired <br />2 - Speed and pontoon boat being stored in winter <br />3 - SnctjT.iobile <br />4 - Red camaro without engine, being repaired. <br />5 - Sunday, July 26 four cars for sale. <br />Applicant stated he was advised by the Orono Police <br />that this was no problem. <br />Mabusth explained that the reason for reading these is <br />that its the position of the neighbors that they question <br />the right of the City to approve another variance when <br />he has not complied with the conditions of the previous <br />variances granted by the City. <br />AMMERMAN (CONT.) <br />Jabbour moved to grant a lot area and lot width variance <br />but to deny a setback variance that encroaches into the <br />average lakeshore setback area and to allow an additional <br />100 ft of hardcover for proposed design changes noted by <br />the applicant at the meeting and that the drainage pro <br />blems be addressed on the property with this new construction. <br />Rovegno seconded. Vote: Ayes (6), Nays (0). <br />© <br />•’ '■ ‘ .M <br />fV.-
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.