My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-03-1981 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
08-03-1981 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 11:50:05 AM
Creation date
2/15/2023 11:49:49 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
W (CONT.) <br />- -• , •. <br />.■‘■'a <br />■^\i <br />LARSON <br />rry Ave <br />\al Use <br />SWARD <br />th Ann Dr. <br />ill Use <br />f. <br />MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 3, 1981 Page 6 <br />Charles Hoinmeyer was present. The applicant seeks a 4 ft. <br />side yard setback variance for his proposed residence. The <br />section of the house that requires a variance is for a <br />greenhouse which will extend 4 ft. into the setback <br />area. <br />CHARLES HOMMEYER <br />477 Park Lane <br />Variance <br />#632 <br />Rovegno questioned the average lakeshore setback line/ <br />questioning why the white house to the north was not con <br />sidered in that determination. <br />Mabusth explained that the vacant lot to the north had <br />already been approved as a buildable site and it was the <br />City's policy to only consider the lots on either side of <br />the property. In addition, she noted that the white house <br />was in a different zoning district. <br />Goetten questioned the applicant as to the importance of <br />the greenhouse. Could the greenhouse not be located in <br />another area of the house? <br />Applicant stated that the southern exposure was necessary. <br />Rovegno asked why are they considering a lot area and lot <br />width variance if there are vacant buildable lots to the north. <br />Mabusth noted that the 2 lots to the north were approved <br />^5 buildable site in 1979. <br />Jabbour moved to approve Charles Hommeyer's application <br />for a side yard setback variance of 4 ft. in addition to <br />the lot width and lot area variance, based on the following <br />findings and conditions; <br />1 - location of the proposed house <br />2 - average lakeshore setback line <br />3 — narrowness of lot to the rear or street side of the <br />property. <br />4 - steep slopes to the lakeshore side of property <br />5 - property is served with sewer. <br />^ Y .V.: • <br />; :vv :.•••= <br />/.V V' ’0" : .. <br />Frahm seconded. Vote; Ayes (5), Nays (1). <br />Minority Opinion - Rovegno - He stated that he could not <br />approve this application because of the substandard lot <br />area and lot width and because of the vacant lots to the <br />north. <br />O <br />Thomas Ammerman was present. The following neighbors were <br />also present: Mary Erler of 3448 North Shore Drive; and <br />Jon Nelson of 3460 North Shore Drive; Doris Stellmacher <br />of 3480 North Shore Drive. <br />THOMAS AMMERMAN <br />3458 North Shore <br />Variance <br />#633
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.