Laserfiche WebLink
I V * • .1 \ • .1 1 . I »: A A > « ‘J-IV J I i'J i i • I . Uii* 5 <br />.^{sctr.sion and rcviciv of tlic final plat, llasscl <br />yticrcl seconded, to rccorrvnd approval of the final <br />submitted conditioned on a park dedication fee of <br />jnd final approval by the City Attorney of the title <br />^ilon. >5otion - Ayes (7), N'ays (0). <br />Tlie Zoning Administrator informed tlie Plamiing Comm ission <br />tlat ho had written a letter to tlie H'JR stating Orono*s <br />concerns and that he had received no response. Applicant <br />was not present. <br />Hasscl moved, Gutl>rio seconded, to table the application <br />until tlie necessary Mditional data is suumitted. <br />’kition - Ayes (7), M.«ys (0). <br />Dan Lindsay and John .Mil, developer, were present, 'fiiey <br />are requesting approval for a comiitional use permit to <br />construct two new duple.xes within 200 ft. of the camner- <br />cial district. <br />Mr. Lindsay is also requesting dock rights for all three <br />duplexes, the one existing duplex and the two proposed <br />units, for a total of slip usage for six f.imilies. Mr. <br />Lindsay stated that it was his understanding that the dock <br />issue was addressed at the time of tlie subdivision approval <br />The Zoning Administrator read the minutes of the July 26, <br />lii26. Council meeting which did not reflect this.1^ <br />The Planning Commission ad'.i.sed Mr. Lindsay that Orono's <br />policy on docks docs not allow rore family units than <br />there is adequate lal;e.shore. Policy is airrently related <br />to lot width requirements. There were no facts before <br />the Conaission to address the dock issue. Dcielopcr was <br />instructed to submit some additional data. ?hyor Van N’est <br />informed the developer that the L'ICD was considering <br />limiting riparian rights to a shoreline distance of 100 <br />ft. In any development, each 100 ft. of shoreline wuld <br />constitute one riparian right. <br />.\fter sene discussion, llassel moved, Guthrie seconded, to <br />reccKTtnend approval of the PRD and duplex credit for tJic <br />construction of tigo new structures within 200 ft. of the <br />comcrcial zone which is required in order to obtain this <br />credit. In no way docs this grant approval of any dock <br />permits at this time. .Applicant would need to make sub­ <br />sequent application, ffetion - Ayes (6), Nays (0), <br />/'hstain (1), McDonald. <br />Mrs. Beck and her son JaiX'S Beck were present. She is <br />requesting a variance for existing .sihstandard lake and <br />side setbacks to construct a larger garage. Applicant <br />proposes to remove an existing overhang on the <br />iiOTse. The pro'Xised larger garage would increase t!»c <br />hardcover, but tliere would l>e a rciluction of hardcover if <br />Kin.LlDT r^ Kin.LHY <br />(cont inued) <br />(?:S5) <br />JA'CIS JtCLPARY <br />3445 EWSini: Ra\D <br />PRhDGI.NG .APPLICATION FOR <br />STILH^S R\Y M\jM.\.A <br />(I'ZaA) <br />lOiLLY .AriZCUl: HOLDING 00. <br />2505 IT.LLY .WPiUE <br />co:;nrrioN.AL ush peit-iit <br />(‘310) <br />□FMSTr>.'E Bna* <br />3.‘«2n Gfl.RRY .A\-.Mi.'- <br />4 ’MR LANCE <br />(1311)