Laserfiche WebLink
r- <br />MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 1, 1982 Pa<je 8 <br />Haininerel agreed with the rest of the members on 48 units* <br />McDonald abstained. <br />(SCHLEE CONT.) <br />Opheim stated that 48 multiple duplexes attached or <br />his second choice was the 48 single family residential units. <br />Rovegno was flexible as long as it complies v;ith the <br />ordinances, either multiple or single or a combination of <br />both, but density is to stay consistent with the code. <br />Rovegno stated that the Planner should comment on the <br />road plan and the 36 unit court order. <br />Planning Commission asked when would the sewer be able <br />to accommodate the 60 units? <br />Applicant stated that young couples along with older <br />retired couples would like this type of development because <br />of certain things like there v;ould be no yard maintenance <br />for them. <br />Opheim stated that the single access off 15 should be <br />reviewed again with the new proposal. <br />No action was required. <br />Hammerel moved to approve the January 18, 1982, minutes <br />of the Planning Commission meeting subject to the <br />amendments and additions. <br />APPROVAL OF <br />MINUTES <br />Callahan seconded. Vote: Ayes (7), Nays (0). <br />The Planning Commission adjourned at 11:00 PM.ADJOURNMENT <br />11:00 PM