Laserfiche WebLink
CITY <br />0F_ <br />ORONO <br />City of OROINO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. _ _ _ _ <br />g) A plumbing permit would have been required in <br />1971 for all work on sewer and water lines. <br />h) There is no record of a State permit for the <br />electrical work. <br />i) Neighbors and former building inspector attest <br />the boat house structure was to be a single-story <br />structure capped with a deck. <br />j) The State Building Code requires the inspection of <br />the various phases of construction and there is no <br />record of any except that the former building <br />inspector states he remembers inspecting a single­ <br />story structure that he assumed was conqpleted. <br />24. The granting of the required variances would result <br />in the following violations of Section 32.340 of <br />the zoning code with which the applicant must first <br />comply before the required variance can be granted: <br />a) The variances would have an adverse effect upon <br />the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br />b) The value of surrounding properties will be <br />adversely affected. <br />c) There are no special conditions applying to <br />the land in question which are peculiar to <br />the land or immediately adjoining property. <br />d) The granting of the application is not necessary <br />for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial <br />property right of the applicant. <br />e) The granting of the variances would impair the <br />health, safety, comfort and be contrary to the <br />intent of the zoning code and Con^)rehensive Plan. <br />f) The granting of the variances will serve merely as <br />a convenience to the applicant, and is not necessary <br />to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. <br />g) The granting of the variances would be adverse <br />to the regulations of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed <br />District. <br />PAGE 5_OF 6