My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-19-1982 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1982
>
04-19-1982 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 11:01:09 AM
Creation date
2/15/2023 10:59:24 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY <br />OF . <br />ORONO <br />19. <br />20. <br />21. <br />22. <br />23. <br />City of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 1254 <br />A guest house use is a change from the original <br />ncn-conforming use of the boat house. <br />The existing structure could not meet the setback <br />standards required by the conditional use permit <br />for a guest house. <br />Applicant applied for a conditional use permit to <br />relocate a guest house on his three-acre site, but <br />withdrew the application on January 19, 1981 when <br />he realii ed the required avera.ge lakeshore setback <br />for the relocated structure would interfere with an <br />addition proposed for the main house. In that application, <br />the second story would have been removed and the remaining <br />boat house capped with a deck. <br />The proposed addition of a three-seasoned porch <br />within the restricted lakeshore setback area is <br />additional hardcover as prohibited by Section 34.202, <br />and is a violation of the 75 ft. lakeshore setback <br />regulations of Section 34.201. <br />Applicant argues that the building permit issued by <br />the City on May 7, 1971 must have included the request <br />to build a second story even though the building permit <br />clearly does not provide such a right and that in 1971, <br />he would have had a right to build an upper story, such <br />arguments have no merit for one or more of the following <br />reasons: <br />a) A building permit has not been provided for upper <br />story. <br />b) Building permit No. 2495 was written for only <br />$500.00. <br />Cost of construction material for a two-story <br />structure in 1971 would have been more than $500.00. <br />There are no architectural plans on file to <br />substantiate a two-story structure. <br />A conditional use permit would have been required <br />in 1971 and there is none on record. <br />f) A mechanical permit would have been required in <br />1971 for all work done on furnace. <br />PAGE_4 OF
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.