Laserfiche WebLink
7 m <br />TO:Planning Commission <br />FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth <br />DATE: <br />SUBJECT: <br />July 13, 1982 <br />#692 Douglas G. Aabel, 1580 Long Lake Blvd <br />Metes 6 Bounds - Lot Line Rearrangement <br />- Subdivision <br />I • <br />Public Hearing - 7:45 PM <br />Planning commission Action - Recommendation of Preliminary Approval <br />List of Exhibits <br />Property Ovmers List <br />Planning Commission minutes (6-21-82) <br />Metes & Bounds survey <br />Drawing of metes and bounds <br />description to be required for <br />subdivision <br />Exhibit E - Septic Memo <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />a formal plat for this lot line rearrangement based on tne t^iowing <br />findings: (let me know if I’ve forgotten any noted at our last <br />meeting) <br />1 -The proposed subdivision will secure the existing front yard <br />of Lot 11 for septic upgrading and the newly acquired area for <br />offstreet parking. <br />2 -The proposed subdivision will permit the upgrading of the <br />existing structure on Lot 11 and permit o%mer occupied <br />residency as opposed to the rental user. <br />3 -There is nothing in the code that defines a simple legal <br />description and the need for platting if that description <br />is more than a single sentence. The triangular parcel <br />could not be described in a more simple description. <br />4 -The subdivision application will be withdrawn if the expenses <br />of a platting are incured. <br />5 -The existing structure could be expanded (upward) without <br />the neet of variance review - both Orono Code and State <br />Building Code contain no condition that would require <br />by bhG Cifcy if Gn expansion exceeds 50% of the <br />assessed market value of a structure. The subdivision <br />is the only vehicle available to the City that will allow <br />controls over future expansion of marginal property. <br />3