Laserfiche WebLink
■ w <br />ti <br />« « <br />f! <br />ti <br />tbUb Schiee Builders <br />^Page 2 <br />*Subdivision <br />The retention pond is no longer designated on this property. <br />Developer has made arrangement with property owner to west to <br />direct drainage via a drainageway (drainage easement) to wetlands <br />on Tonka properties. The drainage easement is designated <br />between lot lines of 10 & 11 for a total of 20*. The Engineer <br />has not addressed this new improvement. The City must receive <br />written confirmation of this arrangement. What physical changes <br />need be made in Wetlands on Tonka properties to retain additional <br />drainage from Theater property. <br />A feasibility study was formally requested by Council on June 28, <br />1982, to determine costs and formulas for accessing these costs <br />for off site sewer improvements, sewer and water laterals for <br />T'lat and improvement of Blaine and possible need to improve <br />i.'.r.ersection at Blaine and Livingston. Please note all Improvement <br />of dlaine Avenue will involve only western side of existing road <br />ar>.v4 not the east side. <br />The Engineer has been asked to address the pros and cons of the <br />offset of plat road at intersection of Blaine in relation to <br />Livingston. Planning Commission may wish to comment. <br />The Park Commission has been asked to review the proposed park <br />site. I have enclosed the minutes of their previous review <br />meeting concerning the tot lot. <br />In review your motion should cover the following points: <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />Density Ratio > 2.6 units per acre <br />Proposed Hardcover - 65,972 sf or 16% <br />Change in access to plat <br />a) offset issue <br />I <br />need for traffic flow study in Navarre Heights <br />area to alleviate burden of 24 new residential <br />units and associated traffic increase <br />c) <br />d) <br />e) <br />basic lot configuration and general layout <br />no direct access onto Shoreline for Lots 8 & <br />future subdivisions of Lots 7, 8, 9 6 10 <br />will not be permitted as areas were used in <br />density credit for applicati'tn #585 <br />drainage to west <br />1) written confirmation from property o%mer <br />2) adequate width of drainage easement <br />3) need for physical changes in wetlands on <br />western property based on increa sed drainage <br />from plat <br />g) <br />h) <br />i) <br />comments on proposed park site <br />direction to Covincil on question of offsite costs <br />response to specific comments made by neighbors <br />in attendance at meeting of July 19, 1982.