Laserfiche WebLink
V; <br />VI •< <br />} • <br />City of ORONO <br />tjrrV RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />MO. /t2. i 9_____ <br />42. There is an existing 20 X 40 greenhouse on the property <br />not currently in use except for storage purposes. <br />43. Addition of a delicatessen or any retail sp^c v be <br />an expansion of the non-conforming use and an aaa • c ‘ to <br />the bulk of a non-conforming use building» both of which <br />are contrary to the letter and intent of Sections 31.108 & 31.109. <br />44. "Use** variances to allow uses not permitted by the zoning <br />code are forbidden by Minnesota law (462.357 Subd. 6(1)). <br />45. Commercial greenhouses are permitted by conditional use <br />permit in the RR-IB district per Section 34.025, subject to <br />all the health, safety, welfare and comprehensive planning <br />considerations given any conditional use permit reyiew. No <br />such greenhouse permit has ever been issued for this property. <br />46. The 1974 Orono Village Comprehensive Plan and the 1980 <br />Community Management Plan both identify the entire neighborhood <br />around this intersection as rural-residential with no commercial <br />use desired. Both plans recommend concentration of commercial <br />activities in the established centers of Long Lake, Maple Plain, <br />and Navarre. <br />47. In addition to the principal market building, there exists <br />on this property a small trailer (mobile home) occupied by two <br />persons as a permanent residence leaving a separate septic system <br />and sharing a well water supply with the store. <br />48. On October 8, 1980, a new site plan and proposal letter <br />was received by the City, reviewed by staff and the Council <br />on October 14, 1980. <br />a) The new plan calls for a 40 X 50 detached greenhouse <br />rather than attached as originally proposed. <br />b) <br />c) <br />The new structure meets required setbacks. <br />An outdoor display and sales area is located in the 50 ft <br />required front setback area but farther removed from the <br />highway than the existing outdoor sales. <br />d) The new plan calls for closing of access onto Highway 12 <br />with all access being from County Road 6, although <br />Wisegarver has stated that he -wishes to retain the <br />Highway 12 access. <br />Pa^jo 8 of 17