My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-01-1982 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1982
>
02-01-1982 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 10:55:59 AM
Creation date
2/15/2023 10:55:10 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
V,. <br />"• % <br />I ••City of OROIVO <br />9? <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. /3l 3 ^ <br />38. Application 1561 made May 30, 1980 is "to transfer and <br />expand existing conditional use pezniit to include greenhouse <br />and delicatessen". A marketing plan was attached to explain <br />the proposed use of the property comparing sales to convenience <br />stores and supermarkets. <br />Stress is given to products imported from throughout the <br />state in season and flown-in out of season. No mention is <br />given to on-site growing of produce although Wisrgarver has <br />stated this is the purpose of the requested "greenhouse". <br />39. No hardships are given to justify granting of variances <br />necessary for allowing the proposed 9' to 14* front yard <br />setback or for requested variance to use sections of the code. <br />40. Constructing th9 parking lot as proposed on the site plan <br />would require major earth moving ar d leveling to remove a <br />10 ft. high hill east of the existing building, which area <br />now accommodates a vegetable garden. <br />41. Mel Kil^, Chief of Police, and John Gerhardson, Public <br />Works Coordinator, both recommend closing of the existing <br />access from the Market parking lot to Highway 12, requiring <br />all traffic to use the County Road 6 entrance. These <br />recommendations are based upon the existing level of use of <br />Pif®P®^ty and would become even more necessary should <br />business activity expand. Justifications for* these recommendation; include: <br />a) lack of sight distance to the east <br />b) conflicting intersection movements <br />c) lack of deceleration lane to Kellers driveway <br />d) existing driveway location allows unsafe movements across <br />Highway 12 to/from westbound County Road 6 <br />discourage "impulse" decisions where through travellers <br />suddenly stop and turn without adequate warning <br />dramatic increase in frequency of accidents at the Highway <br />12 - County Road 6 intersection in last year's time <br />existing entrance is too close to intersection <br />55 mph speed limit is too fast to encourage turning movements <br />e) <br />f) <br />9) <br />h) <br />i) pedestrian traffic is attracted by outdoor displays addina to <br />potential conflicts and hazards ^
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.