Laserfiche WebLink
TikMn TTCV DTAMMTM#^ <br />a?' <br />#665 Richard Speeter <br />Conditional Use Permit <br />Page 2 <br />3) The DNR would respect a request by an applicant that <br />sought a more protected area to locate a dock as <br />opposed to the heavily "trafficked" area of the main <br />lake. <br />Hopefully a written response will be received by our meeting <br />night. <br />Points for consideration in making your recommendation. <br />Please refer to the following item when formalizing that <br />response. <br />1) Hanson letter - 11-17-81 <br />2) Review memo from Zoning Administrator at work session <br />meeting at 12-7-81 (Exhibit 1) <br />a) Statement on alternation of lake beds in Comprehensive <br />Plan. <br />b) DNR rules 6 MCAR 1.5022 <br />Is the application as proposed consistent with the intent <br />of the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan? <br />Is the application as proposed detrimental to the public <br />health# safety or welfare, or materially injurious to <br />properties or improvements in the vacinity? <br />Does the proposed application comply with all applicable <br />provisions of the Zoning Code? (Specifically sections <br />31.834, 31.835 a), b), c) d), and 31.837) <br />!» <br />J