Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 19, 1982 Page 5 <br />Fierst stated that if they can't drive through there <br />safely with cars parked on the side now, then it is <br />l^^safe now, even before this development goes through. <br />Opheim asked the developer why he didn't go ahead and <br />build when they first got approval ^.n 1978. <br />Fierst stated that they fUdn't like the plan and that <br />it was economically unfeasible. He felt that the 48 <br />single feunily units were better and financially more <br />feasible. <br />Rovegno noted for the record that through all the plans <br />that Schlee has submitted to the City, that Schiee has <br />been most responsive and are always willing to conform to <br />meeting City standards. <br />Donna Meyers of 3585 Livingston Avenue stated that the <br />people would have to come down Livingston or Blaine <br />to catch public transportation such as a bus and would <br />this not be an inconvenience or poor planning. <br />A neighbor stated that fire trucks can't make a turn <br />onto Blaine from 15 with an emergency vehicle. Why <br />only have one exit for this development? <br />Rovegno stated then there are already access problems <br />^<And that these problems would be upgraded when this <br />^^^velopment goes in. <br />Fierst stated that Council will address the access onto <br />County Road 15 for future development of properties <br />to the west when that time arises. He noted that this <br />is not the property to have access onto County Road 15 <br />but maybe future development of those other lots. <br />Don Stallman of 3520 Lyric Avenue asked why the road <br />keeps going, eventually there will be development. <br />Why don't they put a cul de sac at the end of that <br />road too? <br />Fierst stated that the City doesn't allow this. You <br />have to have a road to future development on any <br />property. You can not land-lock any property which <br />has a possibility of being developed in the future. <br />He noted that the City Council will address the <br />County Road 15 access issue when development on that <br />property arises. <br />Opheim stated that he wasn't comfortable with approving <br />this concept yet with assumptions being made by expertise. <br />As is, physical layout is adequate. <br />^cDonald noted that all of this development traffic <br />IQ. 11 be dumped onto this neighborhood and that the <br />City shouldn't nuUce new developments onto existing ones. <br />SCHLEE (CONT) <br />i-mmm.