Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />: <br />MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 19, 1982 Page 4 <br />Fierst stated that the existing landscaping would have to <br />removed and further noted that the City suggested this <br />an. <br />Opheim stated that future development of the lots to the <br />west would also access onto Livingston and that the <br />Planning Commission should consider also the future <br />development. <br />Donna Meyers of 3585 Livingston Avenue stated that all <br />traffic will be coming down Livingston instead of Blaine. <br />Haunmerel noted that everyone will not be leaving at the <br />same time in the morning. He noted that his son lives <br />in Huston in the same type of development and that there <br />is no problem with the traffic because everyone doesn't <br />leave at the seune time and everyone doesn't i^rk. <br />Harvey Reder stated that the traffic should not bother <br />County Road 15 then. <br />Fierst noted that the County did have problems with the <br />original access and they stated that it would take <br />about $60,000.00 to fix the big hump that is across <br />from the cleaners. He stated that he has fire and police <br />letters from emergency offices that stated this plan <br />would be the best in case of emergency. <br />Qpheim asked if the City Engineer has looked at the <br />significant increase in traffic and increased load <br />that Livingston will handle with this type of <br />development and also with the future development of <br />the other lots. <br />Fierst stated that the Tonka Toys owns the property to <br />the west and that this should have no bearing on Sbhlee <br />project. <br />Kelley asked about the cement trucks going down these <br />streets. <br />Fierst stated that all trucks would be directed down <br />Blaine Avenue and that if they didn't obey the rules <br />that the truckers would be fined. <br />Karen Gabert of 3572 Livingston Avenue asked who would <br />be maintaining these new roads ans who would have to <br />pay for the upkeep. <br />Mabusth noted that it would be the City's responsibility <br />Opheim asked if a car was parked on the curb legally, <br />cpuld another car m£Uce it through? If not, then maybe <br />e City should make one side of the street no parking.Q <br />SCHLEE (CONT) <br />K <br />Jr ' ' y <br />.. f