Laserfiche WebLink
: I <br />•A i WimH <br />MINUTES OF A PLANNING EMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 4, 1977 - PAGE 4 <br />DRIVE <br />Ta::i <br />W <br />(4) <br />'After A lengthy discussion, Pesek moved, McDonald seconded, <br />to recomnend dmial based on the following: <br />No hardship demonstrated to justify a variance from <br />our wetland moratorivn. <br />Concern about dredging because of the adverse affect <br />on the lake and adjacent neighbors. <br />Policy for peimitting dredging is to provide access to <br />the lake for riparian owners. In this case, no reason <br />could be found to justify this as property owner does <br />have access to the lake. Maintenance dredging would <br />not be necessaiy to provide access. <br />In general, no objectirm to riprap. Indicated they <br />were in favor of shoreline protection and riprap. <br />Motion - Ayes (5), Nays (0). <br />Mr. Lehman was present. Planning Coinnission reviewed a <br />copy of the final plat. Determined that the final plat was <br />the same as the preliminary and meets all the requirements. <br />The Zoning Administrator pointed out that the proposed <br />house location on Lot 3 would require a variance from the <br />75* lakeshore setback. Any proposed dwelling for Lot 3 <br />would have difficulty meeting all the setback requirements <br />because of the lagoon. <br />After a brief discussion, Pesek moved, Hassel seconded, <br />to recommend approval of the final plat as sii>mitted <br />subject to the following: <br />Approval of the plat does not constitute approval <br />of the location of any dwelling. <br />(2) All proposed duelling locations shall meet the <br />miniu 75* lakeshore requirement. <br />(3) Appropriate Paxk Dedication Fee (total $3,086.00). <br />C4) Final plat is same as preliminaxy. <br />Motion: Ayes (5), Nays (0). <br />Work session only. Several adjoining property owners <br />were present: H. D. Bliait, Wh. H. Reese, Jr., Donald <br />Nelson, Lee Hartmann, H.R. Hartmann, Bob deGregory, <br />Donna Blunt, Bette Reese and and Mr. Ellis. <br />Lagoon is presently protected by tiiiber seawall and it is <br />^ving way. This proposal is for some riprapping and <br />installation of an aliminimi seawall. Coanission was <br />concerned about the seawall proposal in the lagoon proper. <br />Felt the seawall would be aj^ropriate in the channel only. <br />GoBBdssion suggested applicants consider riprapping the <br />entire lagoon. Proper^ owners were not in favor of <br />riprapping. Because a 45 degree angle would be necessary <br />^^tiiis riprapping, they felt they would be giving up <br />il(^aximately 10 feet of their property. <br />NORm STAR MARINA <br />(continued) <br />ED LEHMAN <br />3525 SHORELINE DRIVE <br />SUBDIVISICK (FINAL) <br />(1182) <br />. '.XV <br />% <br />.Ti. <br />WALTER'S PORT 1MPR0VB£NT <br />8 MAINTENANCE ASSOCIATION <br />WALTER'S PORT LA <br />(#245) <br />f • •: