Laserfiche WebLink
MINOTES OF A PLANNING CChWISSICN MEETING HELD APRIL 4, 1977 - PAGE 3 <br />[VE <br />OANCE <br />) <br />FORMING <br />The Zoning Administrator stated that this request is some <br />%diat similar to the previous proposal (#238). The party <br />owns Lot 1 also owns Lot 2. Applicant is requesting <br />^l^roval of Lot 2 as a buildable site. <br />The property is not sewered. Coninission determined that <br />even if these two lots were combined, they would lack <br />the necessary square footage. <br />After a brief discussion, Diailap moved, Hassel seconded, <br />to reconmend denial based on the following conditions: <br />Lots 1 and 2 are in comnon ownership. <br />Area is not sewered nor is it planned to be sewered <br />in the ConprAensive Sewer Plan. Increasing den­ <br />sity would only add to the problem. <br />There has been some indication that existing septic(3) <br />(4) <br />(5) <br />systems in tiie area are not operating properly. <br />Lots 1 and 2 are extrmnely siu>standard as individual <br />building sites. Even if confined they lack the <br />necessary 87,120 sq. ft. <br />Suggested combination of the two parcels. <br />Motion - Ayes (5), Nays (0). <br />Mr. Warden arrived after the Commission had taken action <br />on his application. They adHsed him of what had taken <br />^ace, and infoimed him that Comcil would be acting on <br />C jis at their meeting of April 11, 1977. <br />LOU WAR <br />140 aCNET PLACE ^ <br />VARIANCE - LOT AREA § WIDlH <br />(#241) <br />Paul Kempf and his dad were present. The Zoning Admin­ <br />istrator explained that the spplicant is requesting <br />^jpioval for the removal of the erosion of silt which has <br />biiilt up over the years and the installation of riprap <br />to protect against further erosion. Applicant indicated <br />som maintenance dredging would be necessary for the <br />rcmo>*al of the silt. <br />Plannf ng Commission was concerned about the extent of the <br />dredging and the affect this would have on the lake and <br />the adjacent property owners. A considerable amount of <br />silt has washed in over the years according to Mr. Kempf. <br />Three parties representing neaiby property owners were in <br />attendance. They were especially concerned about the <br />dred^ng and the affect this would have on the nei^or- <br />ing properties. They felt they were in the same position <br />and should have the same ri^ts. <br />Mr. Kempf stated that he had met with the IMCD and they <br />had been requested to cut their docks back to the 200* <br />length. He felt this was injust and they had no inteu- <br />of changing the docks. <br />NORTH STAR MARINA <br />3324 NORTH SHORE DRIVE <br />CONDITICNAL USE PERMIT <br />8 RIPRAP <br />(#242) <br />■ M