Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />i i <br />* <br />, I <br />immSS OF A PLANNING OCmSSICN MEETE4G HELD APklL 19, 1976 - PAGE 2 <br />^|hould arise. The Gornnission felt that an owner>tisnailt situa­ <br />tion would tend to promote better niaintenance attd d personal <br />Gon&dm iii relation to the prdpoifty. Tro applicant disagreed, <br />noting that some of the partners in the coni^y wbiild live in <br />the area and would have the personal interest maintaining <br />a high qi^ity of appearance. After all the piblic were given <br />opportunity to be heard, the hearing was closed* <br />The Chairman called to order the regular P4eeting of the Plan­ <br />ning Comnission at 8:10 P.M. <br />Hannah moved, Dunlap seconded, tiiat the Minutes of the <br />Planning Conmission I^leeting held April 5, 1976 be approved. <br />Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0). <br />The Commission proceeded to discuss the rezoning application <br />of the KeJ.ly Avenue Holding Company to down zone the 20* x <br />500* strip of commercial B-3 area within their residentially <br />zoned tract. Van Nest felt that the City would receive no <br />benefit by leavmg it commercial and Pesek agreed, feeling <br />that if it remained commercial it could be made into a park­ <br />ing lot or similar use at a fiiture time. ftr. Everett <br />Schroeder objected, stating that the present Keaveny Dnig <br />paxking lot blacktop was extending into the residential area <br />^md the rezoning would only give a benefit tio tiiem and not <br />wie City. The members felt that this was not the situation <br />but requested staff to verify the matter. Mr. <br />of the Kelly Avenue Holding Conpany stated to ^fF7^'afoeder <br />that it was more of a benefit to them to leave the conmercial <br />area s^tus quo in order for them to have better position <br />regarding the zoning provision requiring duplexes to be within <br />200 ft. of the comnercial area. However, their purpose for <br />the rezoning was to provide a better buffer area from the <br />business (^strict. Van Nest moved, Hosfield seconded, that <br />the rezoning application of the Kelly Avenue Holding Company <br />be tabled until their next regular meeting in order that <br />exact infoimation regarding encumbrances on the property be <br />clarified. Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0). <br />Van Nest moved, Pesek seconded, that the Planning Commission <br />recommend to the Council conceptual approval of the siib- <br />division request of the Kelly Avenue Holding Con^)any, but <br />that Lot ** not be considered buildable until the cottage <br />is removed, ^fotion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0) - Abstain (1) <br />Dunlap. <br />Hannah moved. Van Nest seconded, that the Planning Conmission <br />recommend to the Council that the City vacate a four foot <br />STRIP OF Hill Street lying adjacent to the entire extension <br />^of the A. T. Esco property because it would be unrealistic <br />) believe that Hill Street could serve as access to any <br />other property except Lot 7, . and the renain- <br />ing ^6 ft. of the street would provide amole access to Lot 7 <br />and the Coimission strongly advises that ho consideration <br />ever be given to extend Hill Street for future use due to <br />CALL TO OREER - 8:10 <br />PLANNING COWIISSIQN MEETL'JG <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br />^m•ING OF 4/5/76 <br />KELLY AVENUE HOLDING 00. <br />2500 KELLY AVEfWE <br />REZCMNG <br />KEUY AVENUE HODING COMPANY <br />2500 KELLY AVENUE <br />SUBDIVISION <br />A. T. ESCO <br />300 CRESTVIEW AVENUE <br />VACATION OF HILL STREET