01-19-1976 Planning Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF A FLAMMING GCTtUSSION MEETING HELD JANUARY 19, 1976 > PAGE 5. m ^ } I (AY lT i-.-i tile lot in the 50's and that it was unexpandable unless the l^ty would give up the triangle v?sed in roadway alignment. He presented a plan for a small house noting that the ared consisted of small lots and small houses and would not be inconpatible in the neighborhood. The Conmission menhers stated they had been unable to locate the tract and the Zoning Administrator stated that he had not required a survey feeling that the petition wds likely to be denied. The Commission asked that Mr. Johnson stake out the tract so that they would be able to find it. Hake moved, Dunlap seconded, that the Vincent Johnson variaice application be tabled for on-site review because the Conmission members were previously unable to locate the tract. Motion, Ayes (8) - Nays (0). Russ IVenkstem requested the Commission to approve an 8 foot lakeshore variance to an attached deck for a house plan that h.3 submitted. He stated that his plan was to sell the tract ..t 650 North Arm Drive and that his purpose in submitting the .application was to insure the buildwility of the lot for a prospective buyer. The building plan was to be used to sell tii3 lot's potential. The Commission disagre^ with the intent feeling that they should only consider lot width and area ra ther than include too many permissive conditions. Dunlap '.Tioved, Hake seconded, that the Planning Conmission reconmend to the Council, in order to insure the buildability of the lot to the har^hip in the lot width and lot area and also Sr^cause the tract had been assessed for sewer and had no ndjoining land available, that approval be granted for an 8 foot road side variance and a variance on lot width and lot area. Motion, Ayes (8) - Nays (0). VINCENT JOHNSON, cont. 1376 PARK DRIVE VARIANCE mSSELL NENKSIERN 650 NORTH ARM DRIVE VARIANCE - REAR SETBACK, LOT WIDTH 6 AREA • 1 • i Stewart Perry appeared to request a side yard setback variance of 2.6 foot from the requirement of 10 feet, in order to con struct an addition onto his existing house. Mr. Perry noted that the house would abutt a lot with a tennis court and sub mitted a letter of no objection from James R. Hartzell, the adjoining property owner. Hake moved, Ckithrie seconded, that the Planning Conmission reconmend to the Council approval of the variance request of Stewart Perry as submitted. Motion, Ayes (8) - Nays (0). Doug Heinsch appeared tq^^g^g^st approval of two variances in the construction of a newt at 4025 Watertown Road. Although the parcel exceeds the five acre lot area requirmnent, the width of the tract is only 230 ft. and would need a variance of 70 ft. on the lot width. In addition, he explained that the land was situated in sudi a way that it fell off to the west and would necessitate a considerable amount of fill unless a side yard ^ Tiance of 15 ft. from the required 50 ft. be allowed. The wAing Administrator noted that neighboring properties were all large enou^ to maintain safe spans from any existing stru ctures. Woolley moved, Guthrie seconded, that the Planning Conmission reconmend to the Council that the variance request of Doug Heinsch be approved as submitted. Motion, Ayes (8) - Hays (0). STEWART PERRY 2975 CASCO POINT ROAD VARIANCE - SIDE YARD DOUG HEINSOi 4025 WATERTOWN ROAD ViiRIANCE - LOT WIDTH q SIDE YARD SETBACK