11-26-2001 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

4. The Planning Commission made the foliowng findings of fact: 5. Accessor)- buildings ore not permitted to be located closer to the front property line than the principal building on a standard lot. A standard lot would have both front and rear property lines, and not be a comer lot. The proposed buildings are a 4% s.f. garden building and a 1 ,000 s.f garage to replace an existing garage. fhe proposed buildings do meet the minimum side setbacks for buildings of their respective size. The new garage is being located in approximately the same location as the existing garage. Replacement became necessaiy due to the deteriorating condition of the existing building. D.Access to the garage would be via the existing dri\c\vay to Heritage Dri\e. There is no access from Nuuli Shore Drive to the property. A large vegeiati\e buffer is located between North Shore Drive and the buildings do not encroach into the average setback required for stmcturcs. Access to the property will remain from Heritage Drive. 1*hc City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to permit construction of two accessory buildings on the through lot will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, will not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will its use depreciate siUTOunding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property w ill be in keeping w-ith the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. The City Council has considered this application including the findmgs and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the affect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the conmiuniiy. Page 2 of 6 fiaiiin