Laserfiche WebLink
2. The new house must be connected to t conforming septic system meeting nil the Local <br />and State standards. The existing system is located within 75* of the lakeshore. A new <br />house could not be connected to the existing system and is therefore not conforming. T-: <br />property owner must provide designs for two conforming septic systems on the individual <br />lot on which the house is being constructed (This lot would include the area where the <br />ea :ment exists for septic construction). The survey submitted shows one drainjield site but <br />no design work has been completed It is not known if the property would have n»o <br />co/forming sites available, but it appears unlikely. The only way to determine ifthe property <br />has tw o sites is for the applicant to have testing and design for tw o sites completed by a <br />licensed evaluator. <br />Mr. Puzak has tried unsuccessfully to acquire an easement for municipal sewer connection purposes <br />from the adjacent property owner <br />Zoning Resiew and Hardcover <br />Setbacks Required Proposed <br />Front 30*30* <br />Side 10’10* • <br />Lakeshore 75 ’48' * Requires variance <br />The existing house is located 2.4 feet from the side property line. The new house would be located <br />to meet the minimum side setback requirement of 10'. The primary issue is how much hardcover <br />is proposed and where new structure is located. The propos^ house is 3,230 s.f. which is exactly <br />15% lot co\ erage by structure. In his hardship statement Mr. Puzak has stated his desire to design <br />a home that meets the 15% allowed lot coverage. The size of the house combined with the very <br />limited land area within the 75-250’ lakeshore setback results in the request for hardcover variances. <br />ANALYSIS WORKSHEET <br />Lot Area; <br />LR-IC Lot Area <br />Required 1/2 acre <br />Actual 21,559 s.f. (0.49 acre) <br />iOI-}7l4Ff««tffckru* <br />iMoa«M«rakitMd <br />9/17/01 <br />fttSotS