My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-22-2001 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2001
>
10-22-2001 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 3:26:11 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 3:21:32 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
523
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF ORONO <br />PARKS, OPEN SPACES AND TRAILS COMMISSION MEETING <br />MONDAY. JULY 2,2001 <br />Halvorson noted this area is too steep at the present time to accommodate motorized vehicles. <br />Gappa indicated it would require a substantial amount of grading in the area in order to <br />accommodate motorized vehicles, which is something the City probably would not approve. <br />Tim Lemke indicated he lives in this area and does not see the sense to restoring this lake access <br />point. Lemke stitted he has lived in this area two to three years prior to the Lines r oving in and <br />that he has not observed anyone utilizing this access point, especially motorized vehicles. Lemke <br />noted th;re is no parking in the area and that he does not see the sense to allowing people access <br />to the lake at this location. <br />McDermott stated it is the intention to make this an access point which would be available to the <br />local neighbors within walking distance. McDermott stated the City is not going to put this lake <br />access point on the map or encourage motorized traffic in this area. McDermott stated the Park <br />Commission simply would like to establish a safe pathway to the lake. <br />Lemke stated in his view this area is worthless for swimming and that a beach really does not <br />exist in this area. Lemke stated there are much better places to swim than at th»s lake access <br />point. <br />Meyers noted the Park Commission has merely made recommendations to the Council on how <br />these lake access points should be classified and that the Council will be making the final <br />decision. Me>’ers stated the City is legally unable to abandon the lake access points, and that the <br />Park Commission would like every resident within the City to have access to the lakeshore <br />regardless if they own lakeshore or not. <br />MROnTfi^yPDATE Sr <br />(H5) PARK TOUR ASSESSME?Fi: AND REFLECTIONS <br />Silber stated in her opinion it was a greafVqur. <br />Bouchard commented in her view it was very Mlpful for the Park Commiaiion and City Council <br />to have the opportunity to tour the parks and discuKwhat improvemyits should be made. <br />McDermon inquired whether Gappa has received any cc fregarding Sandy Beach. <br />Gappa stated the only comment he has received from tha^eighbbes in the area is that they would <br />have liked some notice that the Park Commission waf^oing to be uS(he area. Gappa stated it <br />was his understanding all the neighbors in the are^ere informed of tm^our, but unfortunately <br />some of the neighbors apparently did not recei^notice. <br />McDermott noted the Park Commissioi^yould like to trim the vegetation back sbqtewhat and <br />make the beach wider in this area. <br />Use stated the portable bathroom at Crystal Bay can now be removed. <br />% <br />PAGES
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.