My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-24-2001 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2001
>
09-24-2001 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 3:25:42 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 3:20:33 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
325
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
iBConiistcncv with Comprehensive Plan! <br />The 1980 City of Orono Community Management Plan (“Comprehensive Plan”) contains a number <br />of general land use and environmental protection goals and policies with which the proposed land <br />alteration would be inconsistent. See attached excerpts from the Comprehensive Plan goals and <br />policies and views on altering shoreline areas. (Exhibit D). These same goals and policies appear <br />in the 2000-2020 CMP. <br />Engineering Review: <br />The City Engineer has visited the site and has reviewed the retaining wall layout from an engineering <br />standpoint. He comments the top of the area where the walls exists is steep and the walls w ill <br />provide some slope stability. Grade changes have occurred but appear to be minor and the revised <br />grades flow nicely with the neighboring properties. (Exhibit E). <br />Landscape Plan: <br />The applicants have submitted a landscape plan. The plan does not indicate any plantings in front <br />of the bottom boulders closest to the lake, this should also have plantings, preferably shrubs. In front <br />of it. It would also be recommended that creeping type of plants such as grape vine, iv>. or sedum <br />be planted in between the boulders themselves to soften the boulder walls. (Exhibit F). <br />Statement of Hardship: <br />The applicants have included their statement of hardship in E.xhibit B. The aprlicanis should also <br />be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. <br />ISSUIOI <br />1. The applicant is requesting an after-the-fact variance to allow hardcover to exceed 0% in the 0- <br />75' setback to allow the retaining wall construction without a permit to remain. <br />2. An after-the-fact conditional use permit is required for grading within 75* of the lakeshore. <br />3. The existing retaining walls were deteriorated and rotten. <br />Staff Recommendation : <br />• Staff recommends approval of an after-the-fact variance for hardcover within the 0-75* <br />lakeshore setback and the applicants pay double application fees as required for after-the- <br />fact permits. <br />Mt-2717 Ted'Jody Spooner <br />700 Tonkawa Road <br />Variance/CVP <br />9/14/2001 <br />Page 2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.