Laserfiche WebLink
=-T„-r;“=r::;;:r-- <br />c,»««K«n«.of„cwco„mKUo. <br />■bo »»commen<b that no fiuthet hud. <br />future. <br />cover vuiaices be granted to this property in the <br />;~-=r~:rr=-~ ■ <br />Hawn Wottned the applicant that trading hardc'over for lutd,raping underlain <br />plaattc is not the same and doe, no, jt„,ify <br /><}ut,t uid he agreed noting there is a luge amount of structure on the property and is <br />0 e opimon tnat the appl.c«,t should maintain the 14.5% hudcover mavimnn, <br />StoddardashedBresslertoexplu-nthesuggestionsforhardcoverremoval. Alexander <br />thehardcover«,uldsUllbeoverl4.5%. Bress.erinformed • <br />McMillm Urat he arrived a, the 14.5% by subtracting die landscaping underlain utth <br />,^«dctornthehudcover. Theba,a..eofhudcovermberemoved..ouldcomeftom <br />iminatmg a portion of the patio, dog nm, decking, or decreasing the size cf the addition. <br />en said that he would have to eliminate the existing patfo or addition even If aU of the <br />deciong w« eliminated. Lindguist infomted him Utat iffite resid.leace was new