11-17-2003 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Exhibit G -Notice of PC Action dated August 21.2003 •03-Wlt Nv»c«bcr I7.2MJ P«tt2*fJ This application uas originally heard before the Planning Commission at the August 18. 2003 meeting. At this meeting the applicant was proposing the plan shown as E.xhibit D of the Planning Report dated August 14. 2003. At the Planning Commission meeting the applicant’s proposal was tabled to allow for the applicant to redesign in conformance with staf& recommendation which was as follows; 1. Approval of the lot area variance to allow a rebuild of a .455 acre lot in a 2 acre zoning district. 2. Approval of a front yard setback varia.^ce to allow a front yard setback of 30’ when 50’ is normally allowed. 3. Approval of a side yard setback variance to allow a side yard setback of 1 0’ when 30’ is normally allowed. 4. Approval of a rear yard setback variance to allow a rear yard setback of 30’ when 50’ is normally allowed. 5. Denial of the creek setback to allow stniclurc in the 0-75’ creek setback zone. Because the project was being reviewed as a rebuild, the applicant was instructed to redesign a footprint which docs not extend into the 0-75’ creek setback. 6. Denial of the hardcover variance for the 0-75’ creek setback zone to allow 2.7®/o hardcover when 0% is normally allowed 7. Approval of a hardcover v ariance for the 75-250’ zone which would allow for the buildable area as shown on Exhibit H of the original planning report due to the limited amount of buildable area existing in the 75-250’ zone. The applicant has submitted plans which meet the above recommendation. The footprint of the proposed home meets the 30’ front yard setback, 10’ side y ard setback and the 30’ rear yard setback. Also, the applicant has removed all structure from the 0-75’ creek setback zone when 325 s.f was originally proposed and has proposed hardcover in the 75-250' zone at 45% when 44% was originally proposed. The applicants proposed footprint also meets the structural coverage requirement as 12% is proposed when l5“/o is allowed. Issiica for Couldcratioa 1. Is the hardcover percentage in the 75-250’ zone acceptable? Or. arc there opportunities for additional reductions. 2. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Staff RccoBiiBciHlatioa Approval of the revised proposal, as submitted and shown on the plan dated Nov ember 3. 2003, which consists of the following variances; 1. Approval of a lot area variance to allow a rebuild of a .455 acre lot in a *• acre zoning district. 2. Approval of the front y ard setback variance to allow a front vard setback of 30’ when 50’ is normally allow ed. 3. Approval of a side yard setback variance to allow a side yard setback of 1 O’ when