Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, September 15,2003 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(«l 1 #03-2944 JONATHON MENTH, CMtiaaed) <br />Menth indicated that he would prefer to move forward this e\*ening in an effort to complete <br />his project before winter. <br />Bremer reiterated that she w ould support the staff recommendation. <br />Mabusth agreed, reminding the Commission that the applicant does not exceed his <br />structural coverage allow’ance. e\ en thou^ his hardcover might be excessive. <br />Chair Smith stated that whatever the dimensions of the deck, the patio must be cut back to <br />be in line with the deck. <br />Bremer and Zugschwert felt I0'X26’ was accepuble, while Rahn. Chair Smith, and Hawn <br />felt 8*X26' was more acceptable. Frilzler recommended a 6*X26* deck based on assessor's <br />records. <br />Mabusth reiterated that the application was not a strtictural question; therefore, there <br />should be little to deter approval of the I0'X26' deck, and r^uction in kind to the patio <br />below. She questioned what other hardcover cuuii tK- •(.:>ivivcd, since the applicant had <br />already removed railroad tics in the 0-75'. <br />There were no public comments. <br />hlabusih aunred, Breaier sceoaded, lo rccoaiaMad Approv al of AppHcattoa #03-2944, <br />Joaalhoa Mealh, 2930 Casco Point Road, graaliag approv al of a I0'X26* deck based <br />OB the nadiBg that the appUcaal had removed SI 2 s.f. of railroad lies from the 0-7S\ <br />tabjcct lo the patio bcaeatb heiag reamved lo be ia Uac wRb ibe acw deck, thus <br />resahiag ia a hardcover redactloB, per staff recomaieadalioBS. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays <br />1, Frhaler dbseatlBg. <br />Fritzler referred lo his earlier comments for denial. <br />(#12) #03-2946 CLIFFORD L. OTTLN, 23SO WEST WAYZATA BOtLEVARO, <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERhllT, 9:26 - 9:30 P.M. <br />John O'Rath and Will Piper, representatives for the Applicant, were present. <br />Gaffron explained that the applicant has requested an amendment to PUD-1 commercial <br />site plan approval to allow construction of a greenhouse roof system over a small portion <br />of the property between the existing principal structure and the greenhouse roof system <br />approved in 1998. <br />PAGE21of25