My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-15-2003 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
09-15-2003 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 1:41:47 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 1:39:09 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
332
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
myiut <br />StpMMbtr IS. 2M3 <br />ragilafJ <br />I: t-l94J <br />Pit AppHriH— CoMiitrtJ m Ciwfhit; t-IMJ <br />M>0«)r Rtvtew PtrM Etpirtt: I9-I9-0) <br />Chair Smith and Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />Fran: <br />Dale: <br />Subject: <br />Janice Waataja, City Planner^ <br />September 11.2003 <br />03-2941. Paul Cady, 46S Tumham Road <br />- Conditional Use Permit <br />- Public Hearing <br />Zonitti Dbirkt: <br />Lot Area: <br />Lot Width: <br />RR- lA. One Family Rural Residential District (5-ocre minimum) <br />5.948 acres (259.1 lls.f.) <br />424.18 feet <br />AppUcalkm Smiuitary: Applicant requests a conditional use permit to construct a pool <br />on a ‘‘through*’ lot <br />SUfffRecomtmemdation: StafT recommendations: <br />I. Approval subject to the pool location indicated on the submitted plans. <br />Pcitiaent Zoniog Ordinance Sections <br />Section 10.03. Subdivision 10: Conditional Use Permit Required. All accessory <br />buildings on through lots located in “R** Districts shall require a conditional use permit <br />Lbt of Eahibits <br />A - Application <br />B > Exbting Survey <br />C - Proposed Survey/Site Plan <br />D - Proposed Plans <br />E - Photographs <br />F - Property Ou-ners List <br />G - Plat Map <br />Background <br />The applicant submitted plans shov%ing a proposed pool and bam to be located on his <br />propeity which is considered a “through lot“. At this time planning department staff <br />infonned the applicant that the plans submitted for the bam do not meet the 75 foot <br />setback required by Zoning Ordinance. At that time the applicant suted that he will be <br />submitting plans at a later date showing a revised location for the bam which will <br />similarly require a “through lot” CUP application. Therefore, this application is for
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.