My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-18-2003 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
08-18-2003 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 1:41:31 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 1:38:56 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
331
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, July 21,2003 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(»14 «03-291f KEVIN AND DEBORAH THOMPSON, Coadiiied) <br />Frilzler reminded the applicant that she would exceed the individual 1,000 sT. limit. <br />Berg moved to table Application 1103-2919, Kevin and Deborah Thompson, 90 Myrtlewood <br />Rond. <br />Hawn repeated that plans and dimensions would be necessary to proceed. She believed the <br />Commission could support the side street setback variance. <br />Gaflron stated that the side street lot line to the Highway 12 right-of-w'ay had alwa)^ been there <br />as a grassed over area. <br />Chair Smith questioned whether there were alternate sites for the garage. <br />Thompson indicated that the only alternate site would eliminate an alternate site for the mound <br />system. <br />Chair Smith indicated that she could support the side street setback variance with additional <br />screening. <br />Rahn stated that he concurred with staff recommendations and that he believed the Commission <br />would not support the oversize accessory structure. He suggested, once again, that the applicant <br />provide staff with detailed dimensions and a pictorial drawing of the plans. <br />Gaffron agreed that it would be unusual for the Commission to grant a variance to oversize <br />structures on a 1 acre lot. <br />Thompson asked if they could construct the greenhouse on the other side of the existing garage. <br />The Commission supported this suggestion provided the individual building and attached <br />greenhouse do not exceed 1,000 s.f. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Mabnsth seconded Berg*s motion to table the application for purposes of redesign. VOTE: <br />Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />((H5) «03-2920 ST. EDWARD THE CONFESSOR EPISCOPAL CHURCH, 865 <br />FERNDALE ROAD NORTH, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 9:49 -10:00 P.M. <br />Allen and Judy Staricey, Judy Hoover, and Chuck Whittaker, representatives of St. Edward <br />Episcopal Church, were present. <br />PAGE 25 of 37
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.