Laserfiche WebLink
MU-2937 <br />A»g«>l IS. 2003 <br />fait 2 *13 <br />latrodMclioB <br />Bob Morlock is rcqucsling prcliminar>' pLi approx'al for a two lot subdi\-ision of his <br />property located at 980 North Shore Dri\x (Co. Rd. 19) just north of Tonkaview Lane. <br />The property is zoned RR-IB, One Family Rural Residential District which requires 2 <br />acre minimum lot sizes. The property is a 4 acre parcel to be divided into 2,2 acre lots. <br />The existing home on the property will be removed (note that as proposed, the existing <br />house would be too close to the side lot line). The proposed legal descriptions for the <br />non-lakeshore lots are as follows: <br />Lot 1, Block I, Lnglund Third Addition <br />Lot 2. Block 1, Englund Third Addition <br />Both lots conSi jt of 2 acres of dry contiguous land. The property is not located within <br />1,000’ of lakcshore and is therefore not subject to hardcover requirements. <br />I'rcliminary Plat Analysis <br />The property meets all of the following minimum lot size and setback requirements: <br />RR-IB Required Existing Proposed <br />Loti <br />Proposed <br />Lot 2 <br />Lot Area 2 acres 4 acres 2 acres 2 acres <br />Lot Width 200*476.25’238’ <br />1 <br />238.25’ <br />Front ^'ard <br />Setback 50*194*247’153* <br />Side Yard <br />Setback (north)30*260*36’125* <br />Side Yard <br />Setback (south)30* <br />146’ (house) <br />17*(shed) <br />44.4*(shed) <br />160’72’ <br />Rear Yard <br />Setback 50* <br />69.5* (house) <br />10.3*(shed) <br />45.2’ (shed) <br />174*80* <br />All proposed setbacks are taken from proposed 40* x 40* house pads as shown on the <br />preliminary’ plat. The proposed lots have enough buildable area to accommodate a house <br />much larger than the proposed 40* x 40* pads. <br />Access: The property abuts Count) Road 19. Hennepin County has Jurisdiction om <br />access and has reviewed the preliminary plat and their comments will be forssarded the <br />night of Planning Commission consideration. The applicant has indicated that the <br />existing drive access will be utilized for Lot 2 and that a new drive access from Co *'.d. <br />19 will be established for Lot I. The City Engineer has recommended a shared driveway <br />agreement to minimize curb cuts on Co. Rd. 19. The issue of a private drive or additional <br />Co. Rd. 19 access should be discussed. Planning Department staff wt>uld recomipend that <br />i