Laserfiche WebLink
M3-293I <br />Augittt II.200J <br />PagtSorS <br />The proposal Is not contrary’ to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance. The property <br />will exist in the manner that it exists today. <br />The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the <br />applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty." <br />The granting of the variance will alleviate hardships inherent to the property. <br />Issues for CoBsIderatloii <br />1. Should the garage be moved to a location that meets ordinance even thought that <br />location isn't the most feasible and would change the character of the lot? <br />2. Does the shilling of the garage two feet to the south create any problems? <br />3. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Stair RccommcDdation <br />Approv'ol of the fiont >'ard setback variance to allow a front >110! setback of 28.2’ when <br />35* is normally requir^ due to the topographical and setback constraints inherent to the <br />property.