08-18-2003 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

•2921.1972 ShadywMd A«tmtll.2M3 F*|e2 BackgrcNiMl This property is the second lot south of Coffee Channel, so is subject to 75 ’ setbacks from hvo sides Applicant pro^ to remove the existing one-stall detached garage, located entirely within the side Tbe property is very small, and is impacted not onlyby its proximityto the lake.bulbvthcproximity of neighboring structures. The house to the north is only 1 *.2' from the side lot line, and the existing separati^ between applicants house and the neighboring house is 4 ’.5* (their chimne>3 arc only 1 .7* The house to the Muth meets required setbacks, but its detached garage is only 4 ‘ from the lot line; applicant’s attached garage addition will be 1 1* from that garage. Smtt mral Cpvcraw-structural coverage on the property will increase from H33 s.f. toexactly 1500 s.f. as allowed by code. The result is that 22% of the lot w ill be covered by structure. UadCfiysr Hardcover on the property in both 0-75 ‘ and 75-250* zones is proposed to be reduced subst^tially. primarily by eliminating areas of gravel driveway. The detached garage moves out of the (^75 zone, but is replaced with a larger garage in the 75-250* zone. This rc.sults in less open poking area on the property, but still >iclds a parking area on the lot with depth from 12* to 21* allowing for one larger vehicle and one subcompact car in the drivew ay. imin enliy lo the residence svill be the door on the lobe side, with a secondary access tinough e ganp. Applicant proposes to add non hardcover walknayi and non-lincd landscape beds to m'^im^rhaiSovCT“ non-haldeover The garage addition is the smallest fiinctional footprint (20rx2(r) and is located so as to be out of the . ?* '!?„!' ‘ f lo be nearer thes reet than the r^uired 30 setback, but as a trade-off it minimires hardcover. The street righl-of-tvay tel K«Ts“a'shi^ drivw" y"^ xxl ibc street area in front of the hh"'*'ulH*'-a"""»• “ric'ly meet the proposed definition of