Laserfiche WebLink
DBicAppIkailMlItMivttf: 7-1M3 <br />Date ApfUcaltMi CMMMcrtd M CMoplctt: 7-lt43 <br />M-Dajr Review Pcrtod Eipirca: <br />From: <br />Dale: <br />Subject: <br />Chair Smith and Planning Commissioners <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />Mike GafTron. Planning Director <br />August 11,2003 <br />#03 2928 Michael Mischke, 1972 Shadywood Road - Variances <br />• Public Hearing <br />au>ning District: LR-1C Single Family Lakeshore Residential. I /2-acrc min. <br />Lot Area: 0.16 acre (6,915 s.f.) <br />Application Summary: Applicant requests a number of variances to constnici an attached <br />garage and second-story addition to the existing residence. The variances include: <br />1. Second stoiy structure encroaching u iihin 0-75* setback zone, 46* from shoreline. <br />3. Second story addition encroaching 2.9 feet from left side lot line. <br />4. Two story garage structure encroaching 6.9 feet from right side lot line. <br />5. Two story garage structure encroaching 12..' ^ ot from street lot line. <br />6. Hardcover in 0-75* reductions proposed from lo30 s.f(31.6%) to 1000 sf (19.4*I.) where <br />no hardcover is allowed, by removing existing detached garage and gravel areas. <br />7. Hardcover in 75-250 ’ zone will be reduced from 12 16 sf (69.5%) tc 952 sf (54.4"/o). <br />Additional factors: <br />- Lot coverage by structure increases from 1333 s.f. to 1500 s.f. (1500 s.f allowed). <br />- Adjoining residence to the immediate north is 4-5* away liom this residence (separation <br />between fireplace chases is 1.7*). <br />Staff Recommendathm: Staff recommends: <br />a) Approval of the side and street setback variances for the garage addition (see hardship <br />discussion). <br />b) ' onditional approval of the side setback and lakeshore setback for the second story <br />additions - to be somew hat consistent w ith recent approvals of similar situations, should at <br />least be offset to maintain 10* separation from neighboring residence structure (i.e. only a <br />1-2* encroachment of side yard); however, denial would not be inconsistent with recent <br />approvals, primarily to maintain at least a bit of visual openness, but also to avoid future <br />maintenance issues... <br />c) .Approval of hardcover proposal. <br />Lht of Exhibits <br />A • Application <br />B • Hardship Statement <br />C - Existing & Proposed SuA’ey/Site Plan <br />D • Proposed Plans & Elevations <br />E • Submitted Hardcover Calculations <br />F - Photos <br />G - Properly Owners List <br />H - Plat map