04-21-2003 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Pcrtincnl Code Sections: 1. Section 10.22, Subd. 1(B) and Section 10.56. Subd. 16 (C); Structure within 75’ of lakesbore: To permit a second stor>- deck to be located 27.5’ from the OHVVl. of lake Minnetonka where 75* is required. 2. S.ction 10.22, Subd. I (B) and Section 10.56. Subd. 16(CK6): 1 o permit encroachment into the average lakeshore setback. The total encroachment is approximately 5*. 3. Section 10.03, Subd. 14(C): Lot coverage: Regardless of lot area. e\er> developed lot s^tall be allowed at least 1.500 square feet of lot coverage by principal residence and parage structures. To permit a vari.'’;ice to allow lot coverage to be 1.650 s f where 1.500 s f wa, previously appros ed. 4. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56. Subd. 16(LXI): Hardcover in 75-250’ setback: To permit 2.115 s.f (26 4%) of hardcover in the 75-250’ setback zone where 2,079 s.f, (26%) was previously approved. Discussion: The subject property was purchased by the applicant in 2000 The plan was to demolish the existing residence and construct a new residence on the propertv. Due to the size of the lot and all of it being located within 75’ of the OHWl. of I ake Minnetonka variances were reuuircd to redevelop the subject property. ^ The applicant submitted a variance application September. 2000. After discussions with staff and some redesigning the application was heard at the November 20. 2000 Planning CommisMon meeting. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed project w ith hardcover in the 0-75’ setback zone to be 2.079 s.f. Cblo) and lot coverage by structure not to exceed 1500 s.f both of which all lie within 75’ of OllWL of Lake .Minnetonka, lire recommendation vv;is based on the property was currently developed as a single familv residence with 2.328 s.f. of existing hardcover and over 1.500 s.f of structure. The hardcover and structure on the lot would decrease with redevelopment of the propertv. The application moved forward to the City Council and was approved at their December II. 2000 meeting. The council approved the application and resolution which stated .3 original copies of a rev ised survey showing the building plans and all proposed hardcover be submitted. Also, the site plaa'suney shall be in substantial conformance with the plan attached to the resolution. The surveys and building plans were submitted for review by the building department. survey had been rev ised and was in substantial conformance with the hardcover and strvK'tuie approvals granted by the City Council However, the building plans submined showed a dtfferen ’ ground level deck, a screen porch, and a second level deck. The building official made H03-3880 Fred Johnson 1926 rjietness Point Road 4 142003 Pa|e2of4