Laserfiche WebLink
m3-tm <br />Jutll,2€t3 <br />Pagt4 _ <br />Hardtliip Slalcmrat <br />i^licant has provided a brief hardship statement in Exhibit A, and should be asked for his <br />additional testimony regarding the application. <br />Hardship Analysis <br />I <br />Staff would ^e the following recommendations in regards to the criteria for "undue hardshio’^ <br />pertinent to this application: <br />1. 7heprope^lnque.Uoncmn«beiMilloa(c»soiiibleuseifu$edun<lercondilioiuallowe<lby the ofTicial controls.*' <br />77i Wocar/on o/neigh^ring homes and the unique lot configuration result in an airrgae <br />setback line that would make the lot practically unbuildable absent a wriance. <br />^ Ow'laSdSlli^"*’* landouTier is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by <br />are unique to this lot and and were not created by the <br />3. “The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality “ <br />4. 'Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardshb if reasonable use for <br />the property exisu under the terms of the Zoning Chapter.** <br />Economics are not a factor in this request for a variance. <br />*■ forenergy a^ems. V«, we, ihall be granted for euth iheltered conslniclion axhOned <br />in Mtim^ta StjMe^ Section I I6J.06, Subd. 2. « hen in h«mony with this Chapter " <br />i^o ’-flgl'I’O'l^pmperty-saccessMtynlighlyrillbt^uudbylhispropoial <br />5. •'reeBo«dof App«l.^ AdjustnienlsorlheCoiincil may not permit as a variance any use <br />lhal is nolp|CTitted under this Chapter for properly in the »ne where the affeeied per^n's <br />(l^ot Applicable) <br />(Not Appikable)