My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-16-2003 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
03-16-2003 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 1:37:22 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 1:36:06 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
246
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />•03-29t7 <br />Jane 12.2003 <br />Pafc2 <br />Backgrovod <br />Applic»nts puiclu^ (his property in May 2003 and requca a number of variances to constroct a <br />a second story addition and an attached garage. The lot is very small at just under 8,000 s.f. Lot <br />rorenge by slnicl^ i, om the 1500 tf limit, and applicants apparently will slightly reduce this <br />by reducing decks by 1 20 sf. while the attached garage will be about the same size as the detached <br />garage it replaces. <br />The primary issues are: <br />a) The second story addition is partly in the 0-75' zone, and adds additional bulk of structure <br />nearer the lake than normally allowed. <br />b) The 8<xond story addition is proposed to continue the existing extremely substandard side <br />1!*^' u setbacks are so <br />iTlhS^tide wa\u window's can be allowed <br />c) The attMh^ g^ge is proposed to be 4* from the side lot line and extend an already <br />substandard setback an additional 20’ for a total substandard setback extent of 55* on the <br />northwest boundary. <br />Dmiimge is • serious concern, ns all overland drainage &om the rear half of this site nows <br />toward the neighbor to the north... <br />Hardcover on Uie property is very ex^ive and the proposed revisions w ill result in minor <br />reductions while yielding what will be a substantially new house <br />The existing City sewer is shown on the survey as 4' from the proposed garage. The City <br />normally requrres an easement area Iff either side of sewer lines. WTiethcr or not a formal <br />casement c.xists for this line, the City will not allow structure to encroach within 10* of the <br />sewer, leaving the proposed garage too short to be functional. <br />g) There is no permit of record for the deck on the lake side of the house. The assessors records <br />tndteate rt appeared tn the mid-l98ffs. This may be a non-issue if it remains as-is, but if it <br />IS removed or replace it should be brought into greater conformity... <br />d) <br />e) <br />0 <br />Both adjacent neighbors have written letters in opposition to the variances. <br />LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET <br />Lot ArcaA\Tdi^: <br />LRIB Lot Area Lot Width <br />Required 43,560 s.f. (1.0 acre)140* <br />Actual 7,946 s.f. (0.18 acre)50* (shoreline) <br />45* (75* setback)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.