Laserfiche WebLink
Dale ApplicalioB Rcccitcd: 5-2l'03 <br />Date Application Contiderrd a« Complete: 5-22>03 <br />M-Day Review Period Etpirea: 7-21-03 <br />Chair Smith and Planning Commissioners <br />Ron Moorsc, City Administrator <br />From: <br />Dale: <br />Subject: <br />Mike GafTron. Planning Director <br />June 12.2003 <br />W03-2907 Jeff & Cara Ziebarth, 720 North Arm Drive - Variances <br />• Public Hearing <br />Zoning District: <br />l.ot Area: <br />LR-1A Single Family Lakeshore Residential, 1-acrc min. <br />0.18 acre (7.946 s.f.) <br />Application Summary': Applicant requests a number of variances to constmet a second story <br />addition and attached garage to the c.xisiing residence. 1 he variances include: <br />1. Additional structure within a bluff impact rone. <br />Second story structure encroaching w ithin 0-75' setback rone, 65* from shoreline. <br />Second story structure ctKroaching4.3 feet from IcA side lot line. <br />Second story structure encroaching 2.4 feet from right side lot line. <br />.\ttached garage addition and grading 4.0 feet from IcR side lot line. <br />Continue existing deck in 0-75* 7onc (42 ‘ from shoreline) slightly smaller (dimensions not <br />defined by applicant) but probably still encroaching average setback line <br />Encroaclunent w ithin 10’ of City sew er line (City w ill not vary from tlic 10' requirement). <br />Lot coverage by structures to remain at existing 1870 s.f. (23.5^o) where 1500 s.f. is <br />allowed. <br />Hardcover in 0-75' reductions proposed from 1058 s.f.(29.4%) to 806 sf (22.4?e) where <br />no hardcover is allowed, by reducing deck and concrete slab areas. <br />Hardcover in 75-250' zone w ill be reduced from 2257 sf(51.9?i) to 1879 sf(43.2%). <br />Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends: <br />a) Denial of the side setback variances for the garage, as it can be shiAed to meet a 10' setback <br />w ith so-^c interior design changes. <br />b) Denial of the second storx' additions w ithin the side setbacks, because they w ill tend to <br />overshadow adjoining properties, lead to issues over future maintenance, and w ill probably not <br />be able to have w indows on the sides due to building code restrictions based on the <br />substandard setbacks. <br />c) Denial of garage less than 10’ from sew er line. The required set 10' setback will result in a <br />garage only 14' deep . i.e. non-functional. <br />d) The application should be tabled to allow applicants to re-design. <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Application <br />B - Hardship Statement & Addenda <br />C - Existing & Prop««'*d Survey'Site Plan <br />D - Proposed Plans J. Elevations <br />E • Submitted Hardcover Calculations <br />F • Letters from Neighboring Owners <br />G • Property Ow ners List <br />H -Plat map <br />I- fko*» <br />L^.__