My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-19-2003 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
02-19-2003 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 1:36:54 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 1:35:42 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M3-2MS <br />1973 Faterncu PaliH IlMd <br />Ftbrvary 13,2MJ <br />Pages <br />Stalrmeat of Hardtliip <br />Applicants have not provided a statement of hardship. Applicants should be asked for their <br />testimony regarding this issue. <br />Issves for Cooskkrolioa <br />1. Do the neighborhood impacts of not hashing sufficient parking a\-ailahlc on street or on site <br />act as a hardship that supports the gravel parking area variance'^ <br />2. Does Planning Commission find any sufficient hardship to grant the hardcover, average <br />setback and 0-75' structural encroachment to allots the deck on the lake side of the residence? <br />3. Are the staff assumptions correct regarding the nature of the proposed deck south of the <br />house? Arc there any valid hardships presented which suoport the hardco\or variance <br />necessary for construction of this deck? <br />4. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. <br />Staff RccoflunendatioD <br />Staff finds no hardship to support a hardcover variance for the deck » n the south side of the house, <br />and recommends denial of that request. <br />Staff suggests that w hile the deck on the west side of the house w ill have minimal impact on lake <br />views enjoyed by neighbors, and w ill have minimal visual impact from the lake, there is no apparent <br />hardship supporting the existence of the deck. Staff rccoHimcnds denial of this request, and removal <br />of the deck w ithin 60 davs in addition to w hatev er measures are required by the Building Code to <br />make the door safe. <br />Staff supports the hardcover variance for the gravel parking area, based on the lack of on-street <br />parkinr in the neighborhood, and recommends the follow ing conditions of approval: <br />1. Applicant to provide shrubbery between the parking area and the lake for Kreening of <br />vehicles. <br />2. The pacing area be limited to a depth of 25’ measured from the edge of the traveled paved <br />road, yielding a 25-30* lake setback. <br />3. The shed next to the lake must be removed by a dale certain to be established between <br />Council and applicant, presumably as soon as the snow is gone. <br />OpiioBS for Actioa <br />1. Recommend denials'approval per staff recommendation and add any additional conditions <br />you feel are appropriate. <br />2. Tabic for further information (specify). <br />3. Other.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.