My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-19-2003 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
02-19-2003 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 1:36:54 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 1:35:42 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M3-2M5 <br />ItTSFaicrMtfNiMRMil <br />Fcbniary 13.2M3 <br />fl|«4 <br />The proposed deck serves a sliding glass door located 7-8' above grade. If the deck is not approved, <br />the applicants will be required to permanently block the door with a railing or other method for <br />safety reasons. <br />The deck is at a location in the topography where it will have no significant impact on lake views <br />enjoyed by the neighbor. The visual impact of the deck from the lake is minimal. <br />No construction plans for the deck have been submitted. The applicants have not submitted a <br />hardship statement and should be asked for their comments regarding the need for this deck. <br />III. Proposed Dedi Between Garage and Honse - 75-250' Zooe <br />Applicants are proposing a 266.5 sfdeck south of the house and extending toward the garage. This <br />deck would be adjacent to the garage tunnel and would be 6 ‘ from the side lot line at its closest point. <br />The deck constitutes additional hardcover. Again, no construction plans have been submitted fbr the <br />deck, however it is assumed for discussion that no portion of the deck or its railing if one is <br />proposed, will be more than 6' above existing grade and it would not constitute a lot coverage <br />irKrease. If the deck has a railing it must meet a 10' setback from the side lot line. For discussion, <br />it is assumed the deck will not have a railing and its platform elevation w ould coincide w iih the main <br />floor elevation of the house. <br />Pre-existing 75-250'hardcover is 1119.7 sf or 25.1%. The proposed deck would increase hardcover <br />to 1386.2 sf or 31.1 %. There does not appear to be any extraneous 75-250' hardcover that could <br />be removed to mitigate the hardcover impacts of the proposed deck. <br />75-250' Hardcover Aaal)sls <br />Exisliag Proposed <br />House 333.2 sf 333.2 sf <br />Garage 558.4 sf 558.4 sf <br />Dnveway 74.6 sf 74.6 sf <br />Sidewalk 153.5 sf 153.5 sf <br />Deck 266.6 <br />Total Hardcover II 19.7 sf 1386.2 sf <br />Area of Zone 4461.5 sf 4461.5 sf <br />Hardcover Perccatage 25.1 %31.07 % <br />Applicant has not provided a hardship statement, and should be asked to comment regarding the <br />basis for this request and what hardship supports the hardcover van ance necessary. Applicant should <br />also be asked to confirm the assumptions regarding the railing and the height of the deck above <br />grade.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.