My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-19-2003 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
02-19-2003 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 1:36:54 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 1:35:42 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />OUONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Wc^Msiay, jMMry 22, 2003 <br />i JO •*dMk p.m. <br />(M2-20M SUNSTATE CONCEPTS, C <br />Hawn Mated that, in new cooMniction. the City typically asks for two sq>! ic site locations, w hercas thu <br />property does not have it <br />Gaffron indicaied that due to a lack of an alternate site is the reason why City staff recommends the <br />connection non-. <br />Hawn asked why the home did not haw a basement and whether it could. <br />UTuk other homes in the neighborhood have basements. Gaflron could not say why this one did not. He <br />offered that the wetland might haw impacted die ability to construct a basement. <br />Gorr stated that the City Sewer Inspector had indicated that the existing system was conforming. <br />Although a second site is not asailable. Gorr reiterated that City sewer would be the alternate. <br />Chair Smith asked if the wetland delineation would be done. <br />Gorr stated that this would be a future issue to be addressed in the spring or when construction permits. <br />Gaflron stated that staff would suggest a caveat to the motion be that no deck is built until the delineation <br />is finished. <br />Fritzicr asked what type of stab the garage sat on. <br />Gaffron indicated that, while the bouse sits on 12'* block, he was unsure of the garage foundation. <br />Fritaler pointed out that going to a three-car garage, could reduce the side lot. a.s well as front yard, <br />setback requirement. He believed the garage should be cut back to three. <br />GanVon agreed, stating that the applicant could make up for the fourth stall b> extending the garage <br />deeper. <br />Chair Smith suted that the consensus seemed to be that the Commission would support the staff <br />recommendations. <br />Based on the original plan. Gorr noted the garage stood on 8** block and 20" footings. <br />Chau" Siruth suted that the Comrmssion was ready to make a recommendation based on staff findings or <br />it could table the application if the applicant so chose. <br />While Gorr indicated that a 12X12' addition off the bock of the garage did not thrill him. he did not wish <br />to have hu application tabled. <br />Chair Smith asked the Commission if they w ere comfortable making a recommendauon and allowing <br />sufTto work with the applicant to make the necessary garage adjustments. <br />The Commission agreed. <br />PAGE 17 of 29 <br />ClMiBBar
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.