My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-19-2003 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
02-19-2003 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 1:36:54 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 1:35:42 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
NINITTESOFTHE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />WcdMtday, jMMry 22,2M3 <br />(:2t •*dock p.m. <br />(Ml-2tit SVNSTATE CONCEPTS. CmaOamti) <br />Mabusth suggested that the applicant keep the black top for additional paridng next to a ihrec<ar garage <br />Gorr ttted that, in his view, the proposal wn not new construction since he nas using the existing <br />foundatkm. <br />Hawn disagreed, stating that in the Commission's opinion, this was new construction. She wondered why <br />some sviances would be accepuble and not others. <br />Mabusth stated that she had no difficulty supporting the front setback since the City put in a public road <br />on their private property. She added that the proximity to the tnul behind the property also causes an <br />issue. <br />Hawn agreed, view mg the cul-de*sac as something of a hardship that had been imposed upon the property <br />owner. <br />Gaflron reminded the Commission that potential did exist for the cul-de-sac to go away some day in the <br />future, however, he pointed out that the trail could Ke replaced by li^t rail as well <br />Chair Smith asked the applicant how he felt about connecting to municipal sewer. <br />Gorr indicated that he would prefer to keep his septic sewer system as it has been considered a <br />conforming system, adding that rather than an alternate septic site he would consider connecting to <br />municipal sewer as the alternate. <br />Chair Smith asked if the sy stem w ere currently conforming <br />GafTron indicated that the system was built for a 4-bcdroom home and w ill still be used for a 4-bedroom <br />home on a larger scale. He questioned what impact the usage pattern might have on the future sewer <br />capaeity and indicated that no one could predict what impact the additional use might cause. <br />Assuming the applicant was building the home to sell it and assuming the sewer was conforming. Chair <br />Smith questioned whether the applicant should be allowed to continued to use the current sewer system <br />and merely make the new buyer aware that they will be purchasing a 20 year old septic system with their <br />new home. <br />I lawn stated that the City could not force the applicant to hook up to City sewer if their current system <br />w as conformmg. <br />Rahn felt they applicant should be connected to City sewer if asailable during the rebuild. <br />Gaflron pointed out that replacing a sepuc system could run approximately Sl0,000-Sis.000. Smee no <br />one could estimate how long the current system w ould last, Gaffron suted that to connect a force mam <br />system to a new line for City sewer would likely be similar m cost. <br />Mabusth agreed that now would be the ume to connect. <br />PAGE 16 of 29
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.