My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-19-2003 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
02-19-2003 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 1:36:54 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 1:35:42 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, JANUARY U, 2003 <br />7. CoHsUeration of OW Lon^ Loke Road Sewer Request—Continued <br />rejected based on the inadequacy^of the site to support standard primary and alternate <br />systems for the proposed house. <br />Staff reviewed possible solutions and determined that the an extension of sewer to the <br />property may be possible. A pressure system with individual grinder stations could serx'c <br />645 Old l^ng Lake Ro^ with capacity to serve the one house east and two houses west of <br />Jacques site. The area is outside MUSA, but near enough to the existing s>*stem to suggest <br />a MUSA expansion would be reasonable. Metropolitan Council indicated such a MUSA <br />expansion would be a minor amendment because it is less than 40 acres in area and would <br />ha\e no impact on metro systems. <br />Staff had not yet looked at the cost or proposed the plan to neighbors. <br />White stated it would be a minor amendment in order to protect the lake. GafTron stated <br />that the area is totally boxed in and could not grow any larger than the proposed project. <br />Sansevere stated that Jacques would burden most of the cost since he requires the project. <br />Jacques stated that he was aware of that and though he did not yet know the cost of the <br />project, he had requested it be done to scr>*ice his property. <br />Moorse stated the item was exploratory lo see if Council was interested in pursuing the <br />Mayer Peterson asked if the City incurred expenses doing a feasibility study, and then <br />Jacques backed out, who would shoulder the cost of the study. Moorse stated they could <br />come up with a ballpark figure without incu-ring any significant cost. If the cost seems <br />reasonable, then they could pursue it further. <br />GafTron stated that they would contact the neighbors and post a public hearing date but <br />first would need to establish an estimate of cost. <br />Murphy stated he was in favor of the plan. <br />hite moved, and Mayor Peterson seconded, to direct staff to Initiate a <br />Comprehensive Plan amendment request to the Metropolitan Council, including <br />holding n public hearing for that amendment, and provide Council with additional <br />information regarding costs, assessments, neighborhood interest, etc. to provide a <br />sewer extension to 645 Old Long Lake Road. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.