02-19-2003 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

While out to the property for an insulation and roof inspection, the building inspector noticed the eaves on the north side of the residence were more than the allowed 1 '/S’. The inspector verified this by reviewing the submitted plans of which the building permit was issued. The eases were too big. The City then notified the builder of the problem. Shortly after this, the applicant’s brought on a new architect and builder. City staff and the new architect and builder discussed the problem with the eaves and a proposed attached garage. Another set of plans were submitted for the proposed attached garage. The proposed garage met the required 10’ setback. The garage was deigned to follow the setback line, however, when the property was surv eyed for placement of the garage, it was determined the foundation of the newi residence encroached into the side yard setback. (9.6’>9.8’). Phns: Set #1 : The plans that were submitted for the remodel and addition of a second story showed the foundation and eaves meeting required setbacks. Set #2; The plans that were submitted for the attached garage show the caves larger than on set . Because the building permit had already been issued, the residence construction well underway, and the builder was aware of the ea\e problem, only the garage was reviewed for issuance of a building permit. Fouadation: In the LR-1B /t»ning district, the required side yard setback is 10*. The building permit was Issued after reviewing plans and a survey which indicated the foundation to be located 10’ from the side property line. As discussed earlier in this report, when the survey ors were on the property to stake the proposed garage location, it was determined the foundation encroached 6" into the side yard setback. At the corners of the foundation, it is located 9.6’ and 9.8’ from the property line where 10’ is required. Eaves: naves on a single family residence are allowed to encroach no more than I Vi* into a required yard. The eaves on plan Set«I met the I '/»’ required. However, the eaves shown on Set «2 show 30” because that plan is “as built". Also, because the foundation is 6 ” into the setback and the caves arc 30”. they encroach 36 ” into the side yurd setback. (Sec Exhibit C). Lot Line Rearrangement: The lot line between 1214 and 1200 Wildhurst Trail is oddly shaped due to a lot line rearrangement In 1976 the property to the north. 1200 Wildhurst Trail, received approval for a 0O3-287I Dan Sally Weatherly 1214 Wildhurst Trail 2 142003 Page 2 of 3