My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-22-1978 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1970-1979
>
1978
>
05-22-1978 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 12:45:47 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 12:43:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />____» <br />West Shore Lafayette Bay Association <br />•244Cr Old Beach Road <br />Dredging #31 <br />Pg 7 <br />1 feel that the plan as set forth by Mr. Novak is ideal only <br />because of the suitability of the dredging site, and because the <br />wetlands can be used as a holding pond to ensure no contamination <br />of Lake Minnetonka from this dredging activity. During out studies <br />on nutrient release from the spoils area we would also take the <br />opportunity to examine run-off from Navarre (i.e. the Super Valu <br />parking lot). We could examine both lead and oil contamination <br />of the Institute wetlands while it is sealed off as a holding <br />pond. This study will give us an idea of the sources of <br />pollutants resulting from urban development of a small community <br />such as Navarre. <br />I <br />I • <br />The Cr.;juission reviewed these documents briefly. <br />Mr, Novak also presented a map of the spoils disposal area with 7 irserts <br />scaled to indicate the rise in elevation resulting from the spoils as <br />they are deposited over a seven day cycle period. <br />After a lengthy discussion the Commission tabled the issue for lack of <br />time to review the latest documentation submitted. They also requested <br />a more specific detailed schedule of procedures and precautions taken <br />during the project. <br />After the tabling action by the Commission, the association representatives <br />requested the Commission for a consensus of opinions regarding the disposal <br />project if all necessary documentation were submitted. This request was <br />to assist the associatiou in determining whether they should proceed <br />with submitting necessary applications with all other agencies. <br />Although a vote was not taken, it appeared that the majority of the <br />Commission were not opposed.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.