Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />™bdi$ulOT <br />Page 4 <br />dJ:u '"• X J <br />}7 <br />general drainage flow and structure calculations. <br />Council thereby approved the preliminary plat. <br />STAFF - March 2, 1978 <br />Developer is reapplying for approval of the final d1 ar reviewed bv fbo Pinn«-Jr,r. • • . ^^nai prac. This item wastevicwea oy the Planning Cotranission at their meeting of 9 97 7q ..enough informa^^r.« 'Tu« r,* 1 1 iiiLccing or l-lz-lo without <br />alonl „Uh the sho^-e.^o varlLc" <br />plat approval should actually be listed ,m*^ itc™ «:7 i'" c <br />Planning Coatnisslon with a separate request for thrLbjeervaria^e!’* <br />Developer submitted following additional material today: <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />subdlvLLn.'^'"'^ Engineer’s, Greg Frank, comments on proposed <br />flowage easemont^-*^nasr**-' ^d’^^cate conservation and <br />Exhibit N - Aerial vlew “iurpUroverlay'^-*mlri''d-‘'T''*‘ location and sizes of wetlands na«?riiro \ * This indicates approximate <br />Exhibit 0 - Copy of title opinion. pedestrian easements. <br />Exhibit P - Copy of letter to City Attorney. <br />6. <br />Hderf' L:e?o°p"Ltarr:,^:es1:d <br />^nfldentlal. I „ni nor be forwarding a copro^”hls®tryou" <br />The one copy submitted by the develooer is in ^b« f?i r ^ <br />at my office. (I am hownuo.- r ^^5 your review <br />T^is is section #II^h?crdeI{s wUrso?f the rider. <br />for soil tests. This gives us a conditions and provisions <br />to soil conditions and septic systems!) «S“>-3nce In relation <br />7. <br />fn1‘L's%men'ts?"'' <>* Covenants, Conditions Restrictions <br />I'm enclosing the above data along with the progressive staff rnnn <br />for reference. --Check conditions listed on “ report <br />by the Planning Commission (12-5-77) and Council (12-12-77^ enclosed new material fan _ _ , . \ /1 } • The <br />e'ondutonr'' -d'sat'lsf; t^^s% <br />jfC ^ -I’J**-.