My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-09-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
12-09-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2025 12:35:47 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:56:06 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
310
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING CO>fMlSSION MEETING <br />Monday, November 18,2002 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />someone who could design a plan for him. Gaffron stated that the City supplied him with <br />a name,jiothing further, they did not suggest to Ed he design a boulder wall, they merely <br />asked him to give the City a plan that might work. The City got a plan, we are starting to <br />react to it, and we are now asking the Planning Commission whether this is a plan that will <br />function aesthetically, and fiom an engineering standpoint, if this is a plan they could <br />support. <br />Ed Gustafson agreed that there were many issues to resolve and that he had been working <br />with MCWD and the City to design a plan. He pointed out that the plan suggests boulders <br />as a technique of dealing with the erosion problem. <br />Manley explained that, previously, there was no riprap along the shoreline and when he <br />approached the City to obtain a permit to restore the shoreline, the City told him to get a <br />permit from the MCWD. He indicated that they had obtained the MCWD permit and <br />began restoration using riprap until the City told them to stop and obtain a permit from <br />them as well. Since that time, several staff members have met at the site and advised <br />Gustafson and the applicant on the design plan. Manley indicated that he had assumed the <br />entire project would be done this year, as he was sure the neighbors had hoped as well. He <br />asked whether they should continue to go through each item. <br />Chair Smith agreed that they could attempt to work through each item, however, she was <br />uncertain how much could be decided this evening because so many of the issues required <br />further discussion with staff.• <br />Based on the applicant’s ear lier acknowledgement. Chair Smith noted that the shed would <br />be removed. <br />With regard to the gravel parking area, Hawn stated that it should not be included in the <br />discussion since it was not his property. <br />PAGE 28 of 28
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.