My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-09-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
12-09-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2025 12:35:47 PM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:56:06 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
310
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
)rothcr. <br />;nificance in that fact. <br />nnission to lower the <br />the back. As far as the <br />th his stairway as opposed <br />i, Manley asserted that <br />could attest to this. He <br />t him iq;)proval for a <br />i building contractor, <br />concerned about getting a <br />ed to move forward and <br />ti stiff. <br />I received a return call <br />own the unresolved list <br />y after the City agrees to <br />id been asked to remove it‘ <br />do many things six months <br />e parking area was not <br />t parking areas across the <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, November 18,2002 <br />6:30 o ’clock p.m. <br />road and theirs may have been overgrown. Again, Manley stated that the City Council and <br />Weinberger had given him the indication that they would approve his parking area once it <br />was put in his name. <br />Having been before the Commission in February asking for additional hardcover, Rahn <br />asked the applicant whether the parking area was included in any of the hardcover <br />calculations. Since the hardcover figures had been looked at in such detail in order to <br />allow construction of the deck, he wondered where this additional hardcover had come <br />from. <br />Manley stated that the parking area had not been used in any hardcover calculations in <br />February since it was not in his name at that time. <br />Rahn asked if he had built the shed on the property, even though it was not his. <br />Manley indicated he had done so. <br />Janet Manley stated that no one owns the property and they are in the process, as is one <br />other neighbor, of claiming it through the state. <br />Gaffron indicated that property owners can take action to lay claim to property, then it goes <br />through a process where people can respond to their claim, and the Hennepin Count> <br />courts decide who owns it. . ^ <br />•t <br />Manley stated that the property claim process was not part of the proposal. Manley <br />maintained that the only reason they were before the City today was because they had the <br />City come out and recommend Ed Gustafson to design a layout for the shoreline. Manley <br />stated that this proposal is what the City and Ed came up with. <br />Gaffron disagreed, inteijecting that the City, at the applicant’s request, recommended <br />PAGE 27 of 28
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.