Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, November 18,2002 <br />6:30 o’clock pan. <br />4) plans should identify the boulder sizes and types to be used for retaining walls <br />5) prop<2sed plant types should be identified on the plans <br />6) elevations should include the proposed native plantings to review the amount of <br />screening provided <br />7) all tree and plant removals should be identified on the plan <br />8) more detail, including materials, drainage area served, storm event sizing, etc. should be <br />provided regarding the ‘Tirst Flush Drain Zone” <br />9) plans should identify erosion control measures proposed to protect the lake during <br />construction <br />10) plans should be submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for review and <br />I <br />comment <br />Gafifron pointed out that the proposed boulders will add a significant amount of hardcover <br />to the west 0-75’ zone (39.5% per the submittal calculation). <br />Gaffron maintained that the current proposal appears to continue the applicants’ apparent <br />goal of creating a wide yard that walks out from the new door elevations where a narrow, <br />higher yard previously existed. He encouraged the Plaiming Commission to review the <br />pre- and post- construction photos, which further show the amount of clearcutting that has <br />resulted from the grading work in the west 0-75’ yard. Gaflfron displayed a sketch <br />depicting the grade changes that had been made. <br />Notwithstanding the obvious need to protect the undercut shoreline from further eros^, <br />Gaffron noted that the current plan has a number of aspects, which require Plarming <br />Commission consideration so as to, direct the applicant how to proceed. Gaffron <br />encouraged the Commission to consider the following three options or questions when <br />reviewing the boulder wall/landscaping plan. <br />1) Should the grade be returned to their pre-construction status as part of the boulder wall <br />project? Impacts of which would be <br />PAGE 22 of 28