My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-25-2002 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
11-25-2002 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2023 10:19:30 AM
Creation date
2/9/2023 9:51:50 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
424
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Discussioo: <br />The existing residence was built in 1912. The property is located in a two acre zoning disufzt. <br />However, the neighborhood is more in character with half acre zoning standards. If half acre <br />zoning standards were applied to this property the residence would not meet the front yard <br />setback. The proposed front porch still would require a front setback variance, however the <br />porch would meet the required 10* side yard setback. <br />The proposed porch is similar to a front porch approved recently for Phillip and Constance <br />Martin at 1230 Arbor Street. If you drive up and down Briar Street and Arbor Street you see <br />many of the residences have front porches. <br />History of Briar Street: <br />Arbor Street is zoned RR-IB, most of the properties in the area are half acre lots. I'he residences <br />in the area were built prior to the current zoning classification. Because of this, variances have <br />been applied for and approved in the area. Staff researched only Briar Street. Two were found <br />for Briar Street. <br />1233 Briar Street: New deck <br />Average Lakeshore Setback. <br />1261 Briar SU«et: New residence. <br />Front yard 35.5’/50’ required. <br />Side yard 25.9’/30’ required. <br />Side yard Adjacent Street I5.2’/50* required. <br />Statement of Hardship: <br />The applicant should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. <br />Issues for Consideration: <br />I. Does the Planning Commission feel the front porch is in character with the neighborhood? <br />2. The hardcover in the 500-1000’ setback zone is well below the allowed 35%. <br />3. 1 he existing residence was built in 1912 prior to current zoning standards. <br />4. The structural coverage on the lot is increasing but still below the allowed 15%. <br />5. The well and pipe are located 20’ to side (south) of the residence. <br />6. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. <br />#02-2851 Kevin Curley/Wendy Kellett <br />1291 Briar Street <br />11/15/2002 <br />Page 2 of3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.