Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, October 21,2002 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />(IH4) «^02-2840 DAHLSTROM DEVELOPMENT LLC, 2550 KELLEY PARKWAY, <br />Continued <br />Mabusth asked if the water would be chemically treated. <br />Johnston stated that there should be enough movement as to not require chemicals as they've <br />planned it. <br />Chair Smith asked if there were additional comments. <br />Gaffron stated that the application was slated for the November 12,2002 City Council meeting at <br />which time he would try to put together a 1st draft of developers agreement and resolution, with <br />a similar degree of detail as the concept plan. He reiterated to the Commission that if they had <br />any further comments to speak now. <br />Fritzler questioned the future bus stop site. <br />Johnston pointed out that the MnDOT site would be the most logical space for a bus stop. <br />Fritzler asked if there was fear that people might use this as a park and ride area. <br />Johnston indicated that the parking time could be limited. <br />GafTron stated that there could be a separate space for a future bus park and ride later. <br />With regard to the drawings, Chair Smith asked what would go at the other ends of the MnDOT <br />trails. <br />GafTron stated that these would be developed sites. <br />Johnston indicated that the applicants were pretty flexible and went to IVInDOT to ask for <br />everything they might need now rather than going back for more later. <br />Hawn questioned whether the Commission could take action subject to further information from <br />the traffic study and affordable housing issues have been addressed. <br />GafTron stated that they could make their motion and include a recommendation which gives the <br />City Council further direction. <br />Hawn asked if there was a need to make a motion regarding the rezoning and RPUD, or merely <br />final development plan approval, which makes references to the Commission's feelings.. <br />GafTron indicated that the rezoning was treated as inherent in the process of the concept plan <br />approvals. He pointed out that the phasing of fees was also something that the Commission did <br />not discuss, however, would be included in the final resolution put before the City Council. <br />Page 2S